Nuclear power

From Greenlivingpedia, a wiki on green living, building and energy

Jump to: navigation, search
The Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, a boiling water reactor. The nuclear reactors are located inside the rectangular containment buildings towards the front of the cooling towers. The towers in the background vent water vapor.
The Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, a boiling water reactor. The nuclear reactors are located inside the rectangular containment buildings towards the front of the cooling towers. The towers in the background vent water vapor.

Nuclear power is regarded by some as a solution for addressing climate change. Proponents claim that it is a "clean" source of energy and it will reduce carbon emissions.

However, nuclear power is not really an effective solutions for long term sustainable living, or for addressing climate change, for the following reasons:

  • Too expensive: Nuclear is the most expensive method to produce electricity.
  • Not renewable and not long term: Uranium is not a renewable resource. It will effectively run out sometime before the end of this century. Nuclear is not a long term option, only a possible transitional one. According to researchers, the average grade of uranium extracted from mines has gradually declined over the past 50 years.[1]
  • Water: Large quantities of water are required to safely operate the plants - France halved its energy generation from nuclear in 2006 due to water shortages.
  • Too late: If we started building nuclear power stations now, they wouldn’t be ready within 15 years, so they won’t be available in time to realise immediate emission reductions.
  • Not economic: Wind, solar and biomass will be economically competitive with both nuclear and carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) by about 2020, after which the cost of operating both nuclear and CCS would rise. This would make them both more expensive and financially risky over the entire investment cycle. The environmental impacts of nuclear power are likely to increase as high-grade uranium becomes harder to find.
  • To dangerous: The risks of unforeseen events resulting in radio active emissions or even meltdown in nuclear plants cannot be fully mitigated. The consequence of such events can be severe, as seen to Chernobyl (1986)[2] and Fukushima, Japan (2011)[3]

[edit] German plan to exit nuclear power by 2022

Germany has announced plans on 31 May 2011 to become the first major industrialised power to shut down all its nuclear plants, with the last to be closed by 2022. Environment Minister Norbert Roettgen announced the government's "irreversible" decision, which was prompted by the Japanese nuclear disaster.[4]

[edit] External links

Wikipedia:Nuclear power

[edit] References

  1. Nuclear power could lose green tag, research shows, ABC News, April 30, 2008
  2. Wikidpedia Chernobyl disaster, Wikipedia
  3. Is this the end of the nuclear revival?, The Age
  4. Germany pulls plug on nuclear power, The Age, 31 May 2011
Personal tools