Bicycle route naming and signs standards

From Greenlivingpedia, a wiki on green living, building and energy

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 13:52, 5 May 2010 (edit)
Peter Campbell (Talk | contribs)
(Process - Add more info and dates to process)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 13:56, 5 May 2010 (edit) (undo)
Peter Campbell (Talk | contribs)
(Process - Add intro and signatories section)
Next diff →
Line 6: Line 6:
* Please finish your edits and contributions by '''Wednesday 12 May 2010.''' * Please finish your edits and contributions by '''Wednesday 12 May 2010.'''
-* Please sign your BUG on to the letter in the appropriate section by entering your BUG's name (you can include a link to the BUG website if you wish)+* Please sign your BUG on to the letter in the section below by entering your BUG's name (you can include a link to the BUG website if you wish)
* The letter will then be sent to: * The letter will then be sent to:
** Tim Pallas, MP. Minister for Roads and Ports Department of Transport ** Tim Pallas, MP. Minister for Roads and Ports Department of Transport
** John Brumby MP. Premier of Victoria ** John Brumby MP. Premier of Victoria
 +
 +==Introduction and signatories==
 +Dear Minister Pallas and Premier Brumby,
 +
 +We, the undersigned Bicycle User Groups (BUGs), wish to draw to your attention to the opportunities outlined in this letter for improving the safety and utility of cycling throughout Victoria.
 +
 +* [http://boroondarabug.org/wiki/Main_Page Boroondara Bicycle User Group]
==Current issues== ==Current issues==

Revision as of 13:56, 5 May 2010

This is a draft of a letter to be sent to the various relevant ministers on behalf of Bicycle User Groups that wish to participate.

Contents

Process

  • If you wish to contribute to this letter you can create an account on the Greenlivingpedia wiki and then make changes to this letter yourself.
  • Bicycle Victoria has been invited to participate in this initiative as well.
  • Please finish your edits and contributions by Wednesday 12 May 2010.
  • Please sign your BUG on to the letter in the section below by entering your BUG's name (you can include a link to the BUG website if you wish)
  • The letter will then be sent to:
    • Tim Pallas, MP. Minister for Roads and Ports Department of Transport
    • John Brumby MP. Premier of Victoria

Introduction and signatories

Dear Minister Pallas and Premier Brumby,

We, the undersigned Bicycle User Groups (BUGs), wish to draw to your attention to the opportunities outlined in this letter for improving the safety and utility of cycling throughout Victoria.

Current issues

Lack of coordination and consistency across council boundaries

The current situation where councils all do their own thing is quite unsatisfactory. VicRoads has developed guidelines for signage but that these are not binding on councils. Furthermore there is no central registry of the actual names of trails. Some councils use sensible descriptive names, others choose unhelpfully quirky names.

Bicycle or shared path access points and signage

Signs on roads that indicate access points to bicycle or shared paths should be like breadcrumbs, placed at every turn or intersection, etc. to guide potential users to the access point

Continuity of bicycle and shared paths

  • When road crossings are offset - path continuations are not directly opposite each other - signs should indicate in which direction to proceed along the road to find the path continuation
  • Path continuations should be clearly marked
  • When bicycle or shared paths cross, names of all paths should be indicated at the intersection
  • Path names should continue across municipal boundaries, i.e. no change of name at boundary

Links to the external world

When shared paths cross over or under roads or streets these should be clearly identified, thus enabling cyclists to use paths more easily for utility purposes.

Consistent appearance of signs

Signs for cycle paths and routes, both on and off road, should have consistent appearances and information including:

  • The name and/or code for the route
  • A consistent colour
  • A consistent format
  • Be placed at consistent locations along the route, particularly at intersections and turns
  • Be placed at a height where they are clearly visible to cyclists, who tend to look down rather than up

Signs and their location (designated by a unique code) could also be used be emergency services for establishing locations when required.

Hierarchy of paths

  • Conduct traffic volume studies to identify 'commuter' v. 'recreational' paths
  • Develop a hierarchy of 'freeway', 'arterial', and 'feeder' paths, etc. by analogy with roads
  • Colours and appearance of name signs to indicate whether a path is major or minor, i.e. postion in hierarchy

Appropriate level of government responsibility for safe cycling facilites

It is currently unclear who in Government is responsible and accountable for delivering safe cycling infrastructure in Victoria. Currently, responsibilities are spread across and shared between local councils, VicRoads, Parks Victoria and several Victorian State Government departments and Ministers.

Due to the current unclear and diffused responsibility for cycling infrastructure, state and local government bodies involved in providing cycling infrastructure often do not have shared or consistent approaches.

For example:

  • Some departments regard off-road paths as recreational facilities when quite clearly many are now primarily traffic routes, viz. the Yarra Trail during morning and afternoon peak commute times.
  • VicRoads maintains on-road cycle paths and lanes, but not off road paths.
  • Local Councils maintain off road cycle paths, but only up to their municipal boundaries.
  • VicTrack does not encourage or allow development of cycle paths on or near much of Melbourne's train networks.

A state government department and Minister that can coordinate across the following areas and regions would greatly improve delivery of safe and effective cycling infrastructure:

  • an overarching cycling strategy and plan for Melbourne and Victoria.
  • across municipal boundaries for both on-road and off-road cycle paths and routes.
  • across Crown land
  • across railways (VicTrack) land
  • consistent regulations for path signage and markings.

External links

Recommendations

Mandatory legislated standards for bicycle route and path signage are required. It is desirable that these standards are consistently applied both within Victoria and nationally. Ideally, the signs should conform to an accepted international standard in the same way as road signs throughout Australia already do.

A single Victorian minister with responsibility and accountability for cycling who could also own and enact these standards is also be recommended.

See also


You can help Greenlivingpedia by adding more content to this stub article. Click on the edit tab above the article title to start editing and adding content.


Personal tools